The result of this is that the actual temperature 16 feet down takes about six months to heat and cool, where the natural effect of heat conduction winds up having a six-month delay behind the natural surface heating and cooling. The result is that the temperature 16 feet down is amazingly constant, at virtually all locations on Earth. The point being made here is that even just 16 feet of Crustal materials has a natural delay of half a year. Below are references to our calculations of that natural conduction delay effect regarding Global Warming actually heating the body of the earth note 55 indicates that there is probably around a 140-year delay. That suggests that the small temperature rise that has been measured is actually due to the very early part of the Industrial revolution, before the us civil War in the 1860s. (government data and graphs presented show amazingly similar graph shapes, just that the temperature graph is delayed about 140 years after the carbon dioxide graph.) This implies that the rampant use of fossil fuels since around 1950, and even greater consumption of them since 1980. This then indicates that the fossil fuels burned prior to the year 2000, will result in spectacular increases in the earth's average temperature around the year 2140. The current Earth average temperature of around 59F (15C) then figures to be about 83F (28C) around 2140.
Global Warming Presentation - seminar in Business Communication
By the way, the data shown in those government graphs, extrapolated, confirms my calculations that by about the year 2140, the average earth temperature is likely to be around 85F, my worse fear regarding ending all possible plant growth and food. World leaders seem to all overlook the fact that the earth is truly huge and massive, and that its Crustal rocks conduct heat rather slowly. Warming up the enormous Earth so that the atmosphere could remain warm is not very easy or quick to do! The heat conductivity of Crustal rocks is quite important in this effect, and they are rather lousy in that regard. This good results in a significant delay of seeing the actual temperature rise of the earth and its atmosphere. Few people realize just how poorly the earth's Crust conducts heat. An obvious example is to bore a 16-foot (5-meter) deep well. At essentially any location on Earth, the temperature at the bottom of that shallow well never changes more than one degree! During the six months of summer when the surface is heated by the sun, that heating takes about six months to conduct down through 16 feet of the Crust. During the six months of winter when the surface cools due to radiation to outer space, shoe the heat from 16 feet down takes about six months to conduct up to the surface.
It is totally a silly idea! If you can interpret graphs, look carefully at the red line on book that graph note. The 280 line of CO2 matches up with 59F or 15C. The 300 line matches up with about 6F.5C warmer or about 65F.5C. Each horizontal section represents 50 years, and we can see that the red line will cross that.5C line in about 35 years (after 2006 in other words, the data seems to show that by the year 2040 we will already have increased the average. Yeah, i wonder if they will still be dreaming about a 2C rise then? You may have noticed that even by the year 2020 or 2025, we certainly will have already exceeded the allegedly important 2C rise! By 2018, we will likely have already exceeded the dreamed.5C rise!
Revolution really got going so that CO2 graph shows a significant spike, remarkably similar to the earth temperature increase (spike) we are experiencing in the 1990s, 2000s and mini 2010s. (Science has only been able to accurately monitor the average earth temperature for around a hundred years so far, so the graph overlap is not yet really compelling.). By the way, around 2002, political leaders decided to try to 'scare' the public toward conservation by 'inventing' the idea that 'a 2C rise in the earth's average temperature by the year 2100 would be very bad.' no actual research scientist had anything. At the time, no one had any idea of how much of an average earth temperature rise even might occur or what might be dangerous! It was an entirely political invention. Now, virtually the entire scientific community, along with all politicians, constantly repeat the alleged danger of a 2C rise! Any good scientist knows that an actual increase of a 2C rise would affect the weather and some other things but it would not actually be materially dangerous! However, even at Paris 2015, people kept repeating the 2C rise danger and even.5C rise is (politically) discussed!
Once all the plants die, there will be no food on Earth for any animals or humans. This reasoning is frighteningly logical and careful, and I see a credible possibility that no humans or animals may ever live anywhere on Earth beyond one or two centuries from now. Government data (Scripps, ornl and. Ipcc) and graphs note 5 show the amazing similarity of graph shapes of the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and the measured Earth average temperature, once a time lag of about 140 years is applied. What this actually confirms is that prior to the. Civil war, before the Industrial. Revolution really got going around 1830, the co2 concentrations had been rather constant for around a thousand years, and, looking at 140 years after those dates, the average earth temperature had also stayed rather constant (through about 1970 at around 59F or 15C). In the 1860s and 1870s, the Industrial.
Global warming ppt - slideShare
We humans may have already Exterminated Ourselves! Every (6 pound) gallon of gasoline or diesel burned adds.3 pounds. CO2 to the earth's atmosphere note 1, essentially permanently. We have been girl doing such things for 200 years. People are confused by the fact that only very minimal average temperature rises have been detected, and so they claim that no Global Warming is occurring. That is incorrect, because of really obvious aspects of Physics. Yes, additional heating from the.
Sun along with a blanket effect in Earth's atmosphere due to additional carbon dioxide retaining more of that heat near the earth should be warming the earth far faster than scientists have yet detected. Reason for this confusing behavior is that the body of the earth is incredibly massive and that the Crust of the earth conducts heat very poorly. Until I did those calculations in 2004, no one seemed to have ever done that calculation to see the rather obvious delay effect. My 2004 calculations (which i encourage any and all scientists to confirm or deny) seem to indicate that the warming (or cooling) of the deep Earth is delayed by this situation approximately 143 years. This result terrified me in that the consequences of the massive increases of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere during figures to only really heat the. Earth up seriously around the year 2140, to temperatures so high that no food crops or other plants will be able to raise sufficient water from the soil to keep leaves from drying out and dying.
Furthermore, he too, set out to obtain more proof. But his plan to do so wasn't an easy sell. It took kirkby nearly 10 years to convince the cern bureaucracy to create a stainless steel cloud chamber to precisely replicate the earth's atmosphere and conduct independent experiments. As reported in the aug. 25 issue of the journal.
Nature, jasper Kirkby and his 62 co-authors from 17 institutes in Europe and the. Announced that the sun indeed has a significant influence on our planet's temperature. Their "Cosmics leaving Outdoor Droplets" (cloud) experiment proved that its magnetic field does, in fact, act as a gateway for cosmic rays that play a large role in cloud formation. The report stated "Ion-induced nucleation cosmic ray action will manifest itself as a steady production of new particles molecular clusters that is difficult to isolate in atmospheric observations because of other sources of variability but is nevertheless taking place and could be quite large globally. These scholars, scientists, entrepreneurs, and advocates learn how to describe a realistic future in which the world achieves drawdown by collecting and analyzing the best available research on 100 carefully vetted technological, social, and ecological solutions. Global Warming - the Physics of the Process.
Global Warming ppt and pdf free to download
Responses to their findings by prominent members of the climate science community were unwelcoming. When presented at a 1996 conference in london Birmingham, England, svensmark recalls that "everything went completely crazyit turned out that it was very, very sensitive to say these things already at that time." Upon returning to copenhagen he was greeted by a statement"ng Bert Bolin. Intergovernmental essay Panel on Climate Change (ipcc "I find the move from this pair scientifically extremely naïve and irresponsible.". Failing to raise any significant research support, svensmark managed to conduct a boot-strap-funded experiment in 2007 at the danish National Space center that yielded convincing validation. Using a particle accelerator, he demonstrated that cosmic rays colliding with molecules in the atmosphere can, in fact, cause gaseous water vapor to condense into cloud-forming droplets. Again, he received little scientific applause for this accomplishment. But fortunately, at least one person took the danes' early observations seriously. Following their presentation at the birmingham conference, cern scientist Jasper Kirkby a british experimental physicist, told the scientific press in 1998 that the theory "will probably be able to account for somewhere between half and the whole of the increase in the earth's temperature that.
But when sun spot activity is low, and a condition that can sometimes persist over decades and longer, the increased cosmic ray bombardment produces more cloud cover, hence cooling influences. The sunspot-climate part of the connection isn't a new idea. Astronomer royal, william Herschel, noticed a correlation between sunspots and the price of wheat in England two centuries ago. Some scientists have also observed that sunspots all but disappeared for 70 years during the frigid "Little Ice Age" around the 17th and 18th centuries. Yet the notion didn't begin to receive any real attention, albeit mostly negative, until 1995. That was when Danish physicist, henrik svensmark, decided to explore the matter after coming across a 1991 paper by fellow Danes Eigil Friis-Christensen and Knud Lassen that charted solar variations and global surface temperatures since 1860. Svensmark then teamed up with Friis-Christensen to review solar activity, cloud cover and cosmic ray levels recorded using satellite data available since 1979. The connections seemed clear.
upon climate that can't readily be blamed. Not that there wasn't lots of good evidence of this before. Actually, there has been, and it has been routinely denigrated and ignored. Only this time, the high-profile international source will be impossible for the entrenched scientific establishment to casually dismiss. No, not after experiments at the world's leading physics laboratory, the european Organization for Nuclear Research (cern) in Geneva, switzerland recently revealed an inverse correlation between periodic changes in sunspot activity levels, and quantities of cosmic rays entering Earth's atmosphere that trigger surface-cooling cloud formations. Sunspots are areas of localized magnetic activity on the sun's surface that are coupled with high energy streams of charged particles called solar winds. The overall number of sunspots typically varies in frequency over 11 year cycles. During the most active periods the solar winds shield more outer space cosmic rays from penetrating the earth's magnetic field and entering the atmosphere to nucleate low-level clouds.
Its exactly what we expect, but its not good. Had Angela Fritz actually looked at the data, she would know that March temperatures around Washington dc have been running cold in recent years, and there is no long term trend. A high school student @2050Age tweeted first day of spring dc temperatures yesterday, showing how they have declined. Ice Age 2050 on Twitter: March 21st is getting colder in Washington. This thesis is what the washington Post early spring looked like yesterday in Philadelphia. Pennsylvania is having its second coldest march afternoon temperatures on record, twenty-one degrees colder than 19There has been no trend in Pennsylvania march maximum temperatures since 1895. Warm springs are global warming. Cold springs are climate change.
Presentation Modes - global Warming and Climate Change
Last March, the new York times announced that the early spring was caused by global warming. Scientists say climate Change Is a culprit. The new York times. March temperatures in New York have been falling for 45 years, best and five of the last six months of March have been below normal temperature. But facts arent relevant at the new York times. This year, climate experts say that the late spring is caused by climate change. The washington Post also says this years late spring is actually an early spring, and it is caused by global warming, just as they expected. Spring is running 20 days early.